Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Heins's avatar

The IEA has also lost its credibility. Their politics is bubbling very visibly.

“Facts, facts, stupid facts, don’t bother me with the stupid facts.”

My 2nd ex-wife

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

Your data is inaccurate. You are using fraudulent BP (British Petroleum) data. They multiply wind & solar primary energy by 2.5X to make them not look so bad. They also divide nuclear primary energy by 1.2X to make it look worse. Real scam artists. IEA shows the correct data. I wonder why British Petroleum wants to promote wind & solar so much while they denigrate nuclear.

Using the correct IEA data 2019 World Primary Energy Supply was 90.3% combustion fuels and 2014 was 91.3%. So a 1% drop in 5yrs. In 2008 it was 91.2% combustion fuels. And even that 1% drop in 5 yrs is dubious as well because we know China is hiding its coal emissions.

And Renewables in 2019 were 14.1% of total World primary energy. Renewables not including dirty Biomass were 4.7%. Wind + Solar + Geothermal + Tidal were 2.2%. Not a lot to show for over $4T spent on wind & solar. And much of that will have to be replaced in the next decade. Do that plus spend another $200T and were good to go? Not really. Wind & solar get more & more expensive as their proportion increases.

https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-statistics-data-browser?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=TESbySource

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts